
A moment of silence can be used to send a message, recognize a person/event, or result in confusion if the explicit is unexplained or unnoticed. The absence of words can be created from the unconscious as Freud explained. Macherey argues that "to reach utterance, all speech envelops itself in the unspoken" (17). Without speaking the unconscious can develop ideas and connect what has not been said. There can be a clear statement with obvious meaning even if the message is not spoken. The message however needs the listener to be able to connect the dots in order to fully understand the messages meaning. In order to better understand a work, Macherey uses the two questions: a question with utterance and a following question. He says "to know the work, we must move outside it" (21). In addition, "the work has its margins, an area of incompleteness from which we can observe its birth and its production" (21). Interestingly in a text, the margin is silent or blank, while the words contain the meaning. However, Macherey argues that without understanding the framework or "margin", the text is illegible.
Similarly in my first example, without understanding the context of the situation, her silence could mean anything. When I provide context, asking her if she is mad at me, then the reader understands what her silence means. I believe Macherey's theories are even present in texting and online messaging today. When a message is sent, and nothing is returned, there can be meaning. The utterances of even a digital language can be stronger than when speaking face to face.
No comments:
Post a Comment