Like many
things in our (post)modern times, language is taken for granted. The fact that
mankind has created a communication system that is centered on sound and then
prescribed value is actually a phenomenal notion. Language enables us to convey
our thoughts and ideas to others that understand us simply because they hear
the sounds we make and have been raised to interpret those sounds as words. As
Saussure said in Course in General
Linguistics (the easier of the two readings, by far), “Without language, thought
is a vague, uncharted nebula. There are no pre-existing ideas, and nothing is
distinct before the appearance of language” (5).
Saussure went into greater detail about the
dichotomy of sound and words. Without sound, words cannot be conveyed and sound
alone is “a secondary thing, [a] substance to be put to use” (10). The way the
two work together is how a society can function. Having a signified and
signifier enables communication for millions. I did not initially understand
exactly how that made sense; obviously the words signify a meaning, but there
is always more to it than just that. Below is a picture that explains it a bit
easier than the reading and its diagrams.
The Barthes
reading is much more intense than Saussure’s analysis of language and
semiotics. I think Barthes is trying to say that there pleasure people get from
reading isn’t solely based on the content of the text, but on the atmosphere in
which they read it in and how they read. While what goes into the text is
important, there’s a psyche that comes with reading and understanding language
that is not as easily understood and subjective to the individual reader. If
anyone understands the Barthes reading feel free to comment, as I am kind of
lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment